The Human Condition and the Pursuit of Safety

Safety is often framed as the absence of threat, violence, or risk. But this reductionist view misses the complexity of human experience. To truly understand what it means to feel safe, we must explore the multidimensional systems—biological, psychological, social, and existential—that interact to generate a sense of protection and trust in the world.

As philosopher Søren Kierkegaard wrote, “Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.” Safety, too, is a paradox: though we long for certainty, life unfolds amid unpredictability. The question, then, is not simply how to be safe, but how to feel safe—an internal condition shaped by both objective and deeply subjective realities.

The Neurobiology of Safety: Beyond Fight or Flight

The brain’s primary directive is not thinking, feeling, or even perceiving—it is survival. The autonomic nervous system (ANS) governs this imperative, constantly scanning for danger through a subconscious process called neuroception, a concept developed by Dr. Stephen Porges in his Polyvagal Theory [Porges, 2009].

The Three Neural Circuits of Safety and Danger:

1. Ventral Vagal State (Safety and Connection)
   • Supports social engagement, co-regulation, calm, and compassion.
2. Sympathetic Activation (Mobilization)
   • Triggers fight-or-flight responses: increased heart rate, stress hormones.
3. Dorsal Vagal Shutdown (Immobilization)
   • Associated with dissociation, numbness, or collapse in extreme stress.

In this model, safety is not just a concept—it is a physiological state. We can live in safe environments yet feel unsafe because our nervous system doesn’t perceive safety. Conversely, in adversity, some individuals maintain calm because their nervous system has been trained to recognize safety signals.

Porges, S. (2009). The Polyvagal Theory

Attachment and Emotional Safety: Safety Begins in Relationship

Developmental psychology has long established that our earliest relationships shape our sense of safety in the world. Infants require caregivers who are consistent, attuned, and responsive to their emotional cues. According to John Bowlby’s Attachment Theory, the development of a secure attachment style sets the foundation for adult emotional regulation, trust, and resilience [Bowlby, 1969].

A child who experiences reliable care internalizes the belief: “The world is predictable, and I am safe in it.”

Adult Attachment and the Co-regulation of Safety

Dr. Sue Johnson’s work with Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) shows that emotional safety in adult relationships is a key predictor of psychological well-being. The ability to co-regulate distress with a trusted other has profound effects on cortisol levels, immune function, and cognitive clarity [Johnson, 2009].

Cultural and Social Dimensions of Safety

Safety is also deeply influenced by social context. Marginalized populations often live with chronic uncertainty—not from personal trauma but systemic instability. Research in sociology and public health shows that:

• Perceived discrimination, racial profiling, and housing insecurity activate chronic stress responses [APA, 2016].
• Social safety nets, community networks, and inclusive policies enhance population-wide mental health outcomes [Kawachi & Berkman, 2001].

Thus, safety cannot be divorced from justice, equity, and inclusion. One’s nervous system cannot fully relax in a society where basic rights, recognition, or belonging are denied.

Existential Safety: A Philosophical Inquiry

Beyond biology and sociology lies an existential layer. Existentialist thinkers like Heidegger and Camus have shown that human beings are aware of their own vulnerability, finitude, and the fundamental unpredictability of existence.

In this view, true safety is not about eliminating uncertainty, but about reconciling with it—developing meaning-making frameworks that help us live fully in the presence of the unknown.

Viktor Frankl’s Insight

In Man’s Search for Meaning, psychiatrist Viktor Frankl, a Holocaust survivor, wrote:

“Those who have a 'why' to live, can bear almost any 'how’.” [Frankl, 1959]

Frankl argued that the deepest form of safety is not external but spiritual—anchored in purpose, values, and inner freedom, even in extreme conditions.

Psychological Strategies to Cultivate Felt Safety

While conceptual understanding is crucial, the integration of safety requires intentional daily practices. These do not “solve” threat but retrain the nervous system to dwell more often in a regulated state.

Evidence-Based Practices:

1. Mindfulness Meditation
   Activates the prefrontal cortex and inhibits the amygdala, improving emotion regulation.
   → Goyal et al., 2014
2. Somatic Grounding Techniques
   Engage the parasympathetic system: e.g., deep breathing, body scans.
   → Ogden et al., 2006
3. Narrative Processing and Journaling
   Helps the hippocampus integrate traumatic memories into coherent stories.
   → Pennebaker & Seagal, 1999
4. Secure Attachment with a Therapist
   Trauma-informed therapies like EMDR or Somatic Experiencing offer relational and physiological recalibration.
   → EMDRIA, Somatic Experiencing

The Paradox of Safety: Acceptance and Resilience

Safety is not a static endpoint—it is a dynamic process. It is built and rebuilt, often in micro-moments: a calming breath, a supportive word, a sense of meaning regained after despair. As Buddhist philosophy teaches, freedom lies not in certainty, but in the ability to meet each moment with openness.

To feel safe is not to eliminate all risk, but to develop a resilient nervous system, a stable inner compass, and relationships and environments that mirror back the message: you are seen, held, and not alone.

In an increasingly fragmented and uncertain world, the need for felt safety has never been more urgent. But this safety is not handed down—it is cultivated, co-created, and reclaimed. Through a blend of biological regulation, emotional connection, cognitive clarity, and philosophical anchoring, we can learn to inhabit a world that is both fragile and, in many ways, profoundly trustworthy.

‍

References

1. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0054346
2. Porges, S. W. (2009). The polyvagal theory: New insights into adaptive reactions of the autonomic nervous system. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 76(S2), S86–S90. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108032/
3. Goyal, M., Singh, S., Sibinga, E. M. S., et al. (2014). Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(3), 357–368. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/1809754
4. Schönfeld, P., Brailovskaia, J., Bieda, A., Zhang, X. C., & Margraf, J. (2019). The effects of daily routines on mental health: A longitudinal study. BMC Psychology, 7(1).
5. American Psychological Association. (2020). Stress in America 2020: A national mental health crisis.https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2020/report-october
6. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books. (No direct online source available, print book)
7. Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78(3), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.458
8. Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s search for meaning. Boston: Beacon Press. (No direct online source available, print book)
9. Pennebaker, J. W., & Seagal, J. D. (1999). Forming a story: The health benefits of narrative. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(10), 1243–1254. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8721.00027

‍

‍

‍